The Introduction navigation
You are an up-and-coming scientist called upon to research and design a cost efficient but fully functional space station. NASA has spent over 330 million dollars the past few months on Mars landing crafts with disastrous results. Going to Mars and looking for water with the hopes of one-day terreforming the red planet for colonization has become quite challenging and costly. The government's and the public's faith in NASA has dwindled. The proposed space station of your design will not be constructed on Mars or any other heavenly body. You will revive old concepts of Dr. Wernher von Braun, Gerard O'Neill, and Arthur C. Clarke involving rotating stations with simulated gravity. You have the ability to secure NASA's future as the leader in space exploration.
Gravity and Microgravity explained.
http://microgravity.nasa.gov/wimg.html
How and why astronauts exercise.
http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/astronauts/exercise.html
Why study microgravity?
http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/space/mg_ls.html
Dr. Wernher von Braun's picture and description of his space station.
http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/history/VonBraun/SpaceAge.html
2001 A Space Odyssey and Pink Floyd "Echoes" synchronized.
http://www.xnet.com/~arkiver/synch/jabti.shtml
Arthur C. Clarke
http://www.acclarke.co.uk/a6.html
Virtual Reality tour of 2001 stations.
http://members.aol.com/Alprojects/2001
Gerard O'Neill's page on designs of futuristic space stations.
http://members.aol.com/oscarcombs/settle.htm
The Evaluation navigation
Students will be evaluated individually on the performance of their duties.
The rest of your grade is based on group achievement and presentation.
| Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score | |
| Justification Statement | Weak argument with no obvious scientific research or quotes. | Weak argument with little research and weak or irrelevant quotes. | Strong argument with ample research and quotes. | Convincing argument with extraordinary research and quotes. | |
| Data, Calculations and Innovations | Work contains mistakes and not very well thought out. | Some good ideas but not much applied knowledge. | All questions answered with realistic numbers. Some good ideas. | All answers well done with many innovative ideas. | |
| Individual Duties and Performance | Let others do your work. | Tried but took mostly a passive role in reaching group goal. | Solid individual effort and responsibilities met. | Lifted the level of the rest of the group. | |
| Presentation | Not much content and not too pleasing to watch. | Looks good but not much there. | Includes all required material and pleasing to watch. | Has it all and reflects mastery of material. | |
| 4-9 F | 10 D | 11-12 C | 13-14 B | 15-16 A |
Conclusion navigation
The physical and mathematics concepts discovered and utilized in
this WebQuest are not Science Fiction. The mathematics you used is a universal
language. The scientific theories and laws you have followed are the same as
those used by actual engineers. You have performed a very realistic activity.
Each participant should exit this activity with a much greater understanding of
space colonization. Hopefully you are better prepared for what lies ahead and
can make a difference.
Credits navigation
I would like to credit my former teachers and students for all you have
taught me over the years. You have unlocked the wonderful mystery in a grain of
sand to the forces that hold the universe together. You have helped me see the
beauty in all things great and small. May this chain of knowledge expand out
beyond our present reach to worlds that now exist in our dreams. Peace.
Last modified October 15, 2002